Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    FTC fines GoodRx for sharing consumer health data with advertisers

    February 2, 2023

    What we know about Milwaukee’s 2024 Republican convention

    February 2, 2023

    More and more business owners are turning to artificial intelligence to stay competitive

    February 2, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Zepp News
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Technology
    Zepp News
    Politics

    Peter Navarro’s contempt of Congress trial delayed months over executive privilege issue

    shivachetanbijjal@gmail.comBy shivachetanbijjal@gmail.comJanuary 27, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



    CNN
    —

    A federal judge on Friday delayed the contempt trial of former Donald Trump adviser Peter Navarro, possibly months, to allow for more debate on the possible role of executive privilege as the case goes to juries. pretrial debate.

    During a nearly two-hour hearing on Friday, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta grilled Justice Department prosecutors over the department’s position, taken in a previous internal opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel, that the president’s intimate Aides are immune to congressional subpoenas.

    The trial was originally scheduled to begin on Monday.

    In response to Mehta’s question about executive privilege, the Justice Department was on the spot to clear up its vague interpretation of the scope of the president’s immunity.

    During the Trump administration and several previous administrations, the Justice Department issued internal guidance describing a sweeping “absolute immunity” that shielded some presidential aides from even having to appear in court if they were subpoenaed by Congress to testify — despite such The existence of immunity was rejected in court.

    Prosecutors Elizabeth Alloy and John Crabbe sought to skirt Mehta’s assumption on Friday whether such immunity would apply to Navarro if he had been instructed, as a House Jan. 6 committee Asking him to participate in the investigation, Trump was responding to the subpoena, citing privilege.

    Mehta pointed out to prosecutors that they were in a criminal background, saying “in my opinion, you should have some very clear lines before you charge someone.”

    “You can’t ask someone to parse these OLC opinions the way you suggest,” the judge said later.

    Mehta opened the door to the possibility that Navarro could present evidence at trial — potentially taking a stand — Trump had told him the former president was citing in his Jan. 6 testimony before a House committee. executive privilege.

    So far, Navarro has provided no evidence that Trump made such an invocation when he was subpoenaed by the now-defunct House Select Committee on Jan. 6 to provide documents and testimony.

    Federal prosecutors bristled at the idea that Navarro should still be allowed to present such evidence, arguing that it didn’t exist in the first place and that if it did, a jury wouldn’t be able to decide whether such a call would have shielded Navarro from the subpoena.

    Ultimately, Mehta decided the issue raised legal issues that needed to be decided before trial, so he pushed back Monday’s start date.

    Instead of scheduling a new trial date, the judge set a schedule for briefings on privilege issues that will run through the end of March.

    Navarro’s lawyers, while welcoming the delay and the opportunity for more briefings, have been vague about what evidence they would seek to present if given the opportunity to defend the invocation of privilege.

    Navarro’s attorney, Stan Woodward, stressed that he could not promise that Navarro would testify if such a defense was allowed, given the risk of cross-examination by prosecutors. Woodward once quipped that one of the many problems his legal team had to overcome while Navarro was testifying was “calling my malpractice carrier before I get Navarro to testify.”

    This story has been updated with more details.

    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
    shivachetanbijjal@gmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    What we know about Milwaukee’s 2024 Republican convention

    February 2, 2023

    Even Years After Jan. 6, Trump Continues Rhetoric of Violence

    February 2, 2023

    White House condemns House GOP ‘political stunt’ after Ilhan Omar quits foreign affairs committee

    February 2, 2023

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Noise-Cancelling Headphones For a Superb Music Experience

    January 15, 2020

    Harry Potter: 10 Things Dursleys That Make No Sense

    January 15, 2020

    Dubai-Based Yacht Company is Offering Socially-Distanced Luxury

    January 15, 2020

    The Courier – a New Song with Benedict Cumberbatch

    January 14, 2020
    About Us

    This website is all about Tech Health Fitness Business and many other topic that very helpfull for everyone.

    Thank You.

    Our Picks

    Noise-Cancelling Headphones For a Superb Music Experience

    January 15, 2020

    Harry Potter: 10 Things Dursleys That Make No Sense

    January 15, 2020

    Dubai-Based Yacht Company is Offering Socially-Distanced Luxury

    January 15, 2020

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Buy Now
    © 2023 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.